SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9812

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Jagdish Singh Rathore – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr – Respondent


Advocates:
Anil Sharma,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT th ON THE 27 OF NOVEMBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 2141 of 2016 JAGDISH SINGH RATHORE Versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Anil Sharma - Advocate for petitioner.

Shri Prabhat Pateriya – Deputy Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

This petition, under Article 226 of Constitution of India, has been filed seeking the following relief (s):

“The petitioner, therefore, most humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and thereby issuing a writ/ orders / directions / mandamus to quash the impugned orders as contained in Annexure P/1 and P/2 in the interest of justice. To pass such other further order (s) deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice. Cost may also be awarded. Cost may also be awarded.”

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner was holding the post of Assistant Teacher and in the month of January 2010, the election of Panchayat was under process and he was appointed as Presiding Officer for Polling Booth Centre No.135 of District Morena under the provision of Section 28 (a) of the Repr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top