SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9833

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Sushma Panika – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEEPAK KHOT

th

ON THE 20 OF NOVEMBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 28487 of 2019 SIDDHARTH MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Khalid Noor Fakhruddin - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Praveen Namdeo - Govt. Advocate for the respondents/State.

WITH WRIT PETITION No. 26508 of 2019 SHAILENDRA MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri K.C. Ghildiyal, Senior Advocate with Shri Kapil Sharma -

Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Praveen Namdeo - Govt. Advocate for the respondents/State.

WRIT PETITION No. 3858 of 2020 SMT. SUSHMA PANIKA AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri K.C. Ghildiyal, Senior Advocate with Shri Kapil Sharma -

Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Praveen Namdeo - Govt. Advocate for the respondents/State.

ORDER With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally.

The present petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been filed by the petitioners seeking following reliefs :-

"(i) A writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned order dated 30.11.2019 issued by r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top