SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9834

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M/S Mittal & Co – Appellant
Versus
The Bhopal Vikas Pradhikaran & Anr – Respondent


Advocates:
Manindra Shrivastava,R.Pancholi,A.Tamrakar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA &

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADEEP MITTAL

th

ON THE 20 OF NOVEMBER, 2025 CIVIL REVISION No. 1276 of 2002 M/S MITTAL & CO Versus THE BHOPAL VIKAS PRADHIKARAN & ANR Appearance:

Shri Sanjay Agrawal - Senior Advocate Shri Neerja Agrawal -

Advocate for petitioner.

None for respondent.

WITH CIVIL REVISION No. 1200 of 2002 BHOPAL VIKAS PRADHIKARAN & ANR Versus M/S MITTAL & COMPANY Appearance:

None for petitioner.

Shri Sanjay Agrawal - Senior Advocate Shri Neerja Agrawal - Advocate for respondent.

ORDER Per: Justice Pradeep Mittal The present Civil Revision No.1200/2002 and 1276/2002 under Section 19 of the Mad hya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 have been preferred by the petitioner and the respondent, both challenging the award dated 03.06.2002 passed by the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal, Bhopal, whereby the claim of the petitioner–contractor was partly allowed for a sum of Rs. 5,51,517/-. Both these Civil Revisions are being decided by this common order. For the sake of convenience, facts of Civil Revision No.1276/2002 are being taken.

2. For the sake of convenience, the contractor shall be ref

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top