SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9836

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Bhanu Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Munna Lal Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
Avinash Zargar[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA

th

ON THE 19 OF NOVEMBER, 2025 REVIEW PETITION No. 1303 of 2025 BHANU KUMAR JAIN Versus MUNNA LAL JAIN AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Avinash Zargar with Shri Nikhil Tiwari - Advocates for the petitioner.

Shri Bharat Singh with Shri Siddharth Shukla - Advocates for respondent No.4.

ORDER This petition is filed seeking review of order dated 26.06.2025 passed by the coordinate Bench of this Court in FA No. 98 of 2011 (Bhanu Kumar Jain vs Shri Munnalal Jain and others).

2. This Court vide order dated 12.11.2025 qua amendment application being I.A. No. 18751 of 2025 had directed the petitioner's counsel to file an affidavit of the counsel whose presence is marked in the order under review to demonstrate that the matter was never taken up before the Court and thereafter the order has been passed, as the averments made in the application amounts to making serious allegations against the Court. The presence of Senior Advocate who appeared in the case is marked in the order under review. However, petitioner's counsel submits that he is not in a position to file such affidavit. Therefore, the averments made in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top