SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9838

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Mukesh @ Guddu Dwivedi – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI

th

ON THE 19 OF NOVEMBER, 2025 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 10973 of 2024 MUKESH @ GUDDU DWIVEDI Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Manish Kumar Mukhraiya - Advocate for the appellant. Shri Anil Upadhyay - Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State.

J U D G M E N T With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, heard finally.

This criminal appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, herein after referred to as the Code) has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 19.09.2024 in S.T. No.84 of 2019 passed by learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Dindori (MP) whereby the appellant has been convicted for offence under Section 120-B read with Section 465 of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a term of 06 months with fine of Rs.5,000/- with default stipulation.

2. In this case, accused persons, namely, Ajmer Das, Arti Mongre, Santu Singh, Devendra @ Deepak Burman and the present appellant Mukesh @ Guddu Dwivedi are charged under sections 120-B r/w Sections 420, 467 and 471 of IPC that between th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top