SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9851

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Jitendra – Appellant
Versus
Lalu @ Hirendra Rai – Respondent


Advocates:
,P.P.Budholiya,,Sanjay Soni,A.Jambholkar(R1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIMANSHU JOSHI

th

ON THE 17 OF NOVEMBER, 2025 MISC. APPEAL No. 800 of 2011 JITENDRA Versus LALU @ HIRENDRA RAI AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sushil Kumar Sharma - Advocate for appellant.

None for the respondent.

ORDER The present appeal has been preferred taking exception to the provisions of Section 173 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 whereby award dated 29/11/2010 passed in Case No. 6 of 2008 by learned Third Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mandla has been challenged. By the impugned order dated 29/11/2010, the claim petition filed by the claimant has been dismissed.

2. The necessary facts for disposal of the present appeal are as under: The appellant/injured is seven years boy Jitendra Maravi and the application for compensation has been filed through his father Tulsiram Maravi. An application under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act has been filed claiming Rs.9,00,000/- for the accidental injuries sustained in an accident caused on 25/04/2007 at 8 pm. As per the claim application, the appellant was standing near a house then the respondent No.1, while driving TVS Motor Cycle No. MP 18 BA/5696

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top