SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9933

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Dinesh Kumar Parashar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT th ON THE 16 OF OCTOBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 4693 of 2014 DINESH KUMAR PARASHAR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Ms. Smrati Sharma – Advocate for petitioner.

Shri Yogesh Parashar – Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

This petition, under Article 226 of Constitution of India, has been preferred seeking the following relief (s):

“1. That, impugned action or inaction on part of the respondents may kindly be held to be illegal and consequently the respondents be directed to issue promotion order in favour of the petitioner promoting him on the post of Assistant Engineer implementing the recommendations of departmental promotion committee made by it on 05.05.2012 w.e.f. from the due date of promotion or to other similarly situated persons along with all consequential benefits including arrears of pay etc.

2. The cost of the petition be awarded to the petitioner.

3. Any other order or directions deemed fit in the circumstances of the case be issued in favour of the petitioner.”

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner was holding the post of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top