SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9934

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Dilip Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Shashank Upadhyay,Cs.Jhariya,Vikash Jyotshi,Advocate General,Ag.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B. P. SHARMA

th

ON THE 16 OF OCTOBER, 2025 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1204 of 2008 DILIP SINGH Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Shashank Upadhyay - Advocate for the appellant.

Ms. Vineeta Sharma - Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State.

ORDER With consent, arguments heard finally.

This appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.05.2008 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Tikamgarh in Special Sessions Trial No.144/2004 (State of MP Vs. Dilip Singh) whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence under Sections 323, 506 of IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and directed to pay fine of Rs.1,000/-, to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- and sentenced to undergo R.I for two years with fine of Rs.5,000/- respectively, with default stipulations.

2. As per prosecution story, the complainant-Gayadeen Ahirwar (PW-1) belongs to Ahirwar caste which comes under scheduled caste whereas appellant-accused does not belong to SC or ST category.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top