SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9938

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Narendra Nath – Appellant
Versus
The State Of M.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ln.Sakle,Sk.Thakur,A.Mishra,Sa.Khan,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B. P. SHARMA

th

ON THE 16 OF OCTOBER, 2025 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2058 of 2003 NARENDRA NATH Versus THE STATE OF M.P.

Appearance:

Shri Sunil Sakle - Advocate for appellant.

Shri Manoj Kushwaha - Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

Shri Ankur Kashyap - Advocate for complainant.

ORDER This appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. against the judgment of conviction dated 12.11.2003 passed by learned Special Judge (Atrocities) Hoshangabad in Sessions Trial No.105/2001 whereby the appellant was punished for the offences under section 354 of IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 1 year and to pay fine of Rs.500/- and under section 3(1)(11) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and sentenced to undergo R.I for 6 months and to pay fine of Rs.500/- and under Section 506-B of IPC read with Section 3(1) (10) SC/ST and sentenced to undergo R.I for 6 months and to pay fine of Rs.500/- with default stipulations.

2. As per the prosecution story on 12.02.2001 the prosecutrix lodged a report that on 11.02.2001 at about 5.00 PM when she was sitting in front of her house at t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top