SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 10007

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Surendra Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Dharmendra Singh Raghuwanshi[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHISH SHROTI

th

ON THE 13 OF OCTOBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 40315 of 2025 SURENDRA SINGH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri M.P.S. Raghuvanshi - Senior Advocate wit Shri Dharmendra Singh Raghuwanshi- Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Naval Kishor Gupta- GA for the respondents/State.

ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved by the issuance of charge-sheet dated

24/12/2024 (Annexure- P/1) while the criminal case against him is also pending in relation to same set of allegations. The continuance of enquiry pursuant to aforesaid charge-sheet has been challenged primarily on the ground that on the same set of allegations an FIR has been registered against the petitioner and in respect of which investigation is going on.

2. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submitted that simultaneous continuance of departmental enquiry vis-a-vis the criminal case in respect of the same allegations would cause serious prejudice to the petitioner inasmuch as he would be required to disclose his defence in the departmental enquiry.

3. Heard the arguments on admission.

4. The facts as gathered from the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top