SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 10009

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Titku Ram Sahu – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh Housing And Infrastructure Development Board – Respondent


Advocates:
Deepak Kumar Pandey[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI

th

ON THE 13 OF OCTOBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 40003 of 2025 TITKU RAM SAHU Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Anubhav Singhal - Advocate for the petitioner.

ORDER This petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the impugned order dated 26-06-2025 (Annexure-P/8).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the date of birth of the petitioner has been incorrectly recorded in the Service Book as 28-06- 1963. It is pointed out that in the Aadhaar Card, the petitioner’s date of birth is mentioned as 01-01-1967, and in the Voter List prepared on 01-01-2003, the petitioner’s age has been shown as 40 years. It is, therefore, contended that necessary correction in the service record ought to have been carried out.

3. However, treating the petitioner’s date of birth as 28-06-1963, the respondents sought to superannuate him with effect from 30-06-2025. The petitioner, therefore, submitted a representation dated 15-05-2025 highlighting his grievance, but the same was rejected by the respondent- authority. The said re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top