SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 10016

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ashish Gautam – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Amit Lahoti,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE

th

ON THE 13 OF OCTOBER, 2025 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 26099 of 2024 ASHISH GAUTAM Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Brajesh Kumar Tyagi - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Samar Ghuraiya - Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.1/State.

ORDER Notices to the respondent No.2 by RAD mode were sent. However, the service report has not been returned back. Thus, in the light of Chapter XV, Rule 11(2), of the High Court Rules, Respondent no. 2 is treated to be deemed served.

2. This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner for quashment of FIR bearing crime No.224/2024 registered at Police Station Hajira District Gwalior for offence punishable under Sections

376(2)(N), 506, 323 of IPC.

3. As per the prosecution case, the present FIR has been registered on the basis of a written complaint submitted by the prosecutrix/respondent No. 2. It is alleged in the complaint that the marriage of the prosecutrix was solemnized with one Vikki Mourya in the year 2020. Subsequently, the petitioner came into contact with the prosecutrix at a garments sho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top