SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 10031

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt Sunan Bai Pal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Shakti Kumar Soni,Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI

th

ON THE 9 OF OCTOBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 31458 of 2025 SMT SUMAN BAI PAL Versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Shakti Kumar Soni - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Prabhanshu Shukla - Government Advocate for the respondent/State.

ORDER This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 14.07.2025 contained in Annexure P/8.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner is a superannuated "Aganwadi Karyakarta" who is disputing her date of birth, on the strength of which, she stood superannuated vide order dated 04.01.2023 contained in Annexure P/4. It is contended by the counsel that the petitioner was issued a notice to appear before the Medical Board and submitted a certificate in order to ascertain her age. The said certificate was submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure P/2 and the age of the petitioner on the date of issuance of certificate i.e. 02.08.2022 was found to be between 55-60 years. However, the said certificate was not accepted by the respondent vide Annexure P/1 da

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top