HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rajat Ajmera – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
MCRC 60301/2025
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:37986
1 MCRC-60301-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIMANSHU JOSHI
th
ON THE 29 OF DECEMBER, 2025
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 60301 of 2025
RAJAT AJMERA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Appearance:
Applicant (s) by Shri Ayushman Gupta - Advocate.
Respondent - State of Madhya Pradesh by Shri Rahul Solanki -
Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Advocate General.
ORDER
This first application has been filed by the applicant under Section 483
of BNSS, 2023 for grant of bail in connection with Crime No.393 of 2025
registered at Police Station - Balakwada, District Khargone (M.P.) for
offence punishable under Section 318 (4) of BNS, 2023 along with Section 3
read with Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The applicant is in
custody since 03.12.2025.
2] Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant
has been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that this Court, in the
case of Santosh Sahare vs. State of Madhya Pradesh 2015(3) MPJR 50, has
held that offence under Section 3/7 of the Act of 1955 is a bailable offence
as the amendment has not been brought in the Act of 1955 after some
ordinance in the year 1981. It is further submitted that on the basis of the said
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: RAMESH
CHANDRA PITHAWE
Signing time: 12/31/2025
3:09:53 PM
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:37986
2 MCRC-60301-2025
principle, this Court in number of cases has granted bail holding that the
offence under Section 3/7 is a bailable offence. Learned counsel for the
applicant has also placed reliance on the order dated 05.09.2020 passed by
Indore Bench of this Court in M.Cr.C. No.26957/2020 (Rakesh Kumar vs.
State of M.P.) wherein, the Court has considered the effect of the earlier
amendment and its period and held that offence under Section 3/7 of the Act
of 1955 is a bailable offence. It is further submitted that the applicant has
been lodged in jail since 03.12.2025 and the final conclusion of trial will take
sufficiently long time, thus, it is prayed that the application be allowed.
3] Learned counsel for the respondent/State has vehemently opposed
the prayer and prayed for dismissal of the bail application.
4] Having heard the rival submissions and on perusal of the case
diary as also looking to the fact that the alleged offence under the Essential
Commodities Act, 1955 is bailable, this Court finds that the further custody
of the applicant does not appear to be necessary.
5] Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, the
application filed by the applicant is hereby allowed. The applicant is directed
to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) with one solvent surety of the like
amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his/her regular appearance
before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he / she shall remain
present before the court concerned during trial and shall also abide by the
conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) Criminal Procedure Code,
1973.
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: RAMESH
CHANDRA PITHAWE
Signing time: 12/31/2025
3:09:53 PM
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:37986
3 MCRC-60301-2025
6] Accordingly, the application is allowed and disposed of.
Certified copy as per rules.
(HIMANSHU JOSHI)
V. JUDGE
rcp
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: RAMESH
CHANDRA PITHAWE
Signing time: 12/31/2025
3:09:53 PM
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.