SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 10095

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Satyarajsingh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Arjun Pathak[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIMANSHU JOSHI

th

ON THE 29 OF DECEMBER, 2025

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 58434 of 2025

SATYARAJSINGH

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Appearance:

Applicant (s) by Shri Vishal Baheti - Learned Senior Advocate

assisted by Shri Arjun Pathak - Advocate.

Respondent - State of Madhya Pradesh by Shri Viraj Godha -

Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Advocate General.

ORDER after some ordinance in the year 1981. It is further submitted that on the basis of the said principle, this Court in number of cases has granted bail holding that the offence under Section 3/7 is a bailable offence. Learned Senior counsel for the applicant has also placed reliance on the order dated 05.09.2020 passed by Indore Bench of this Court in M.Cr.C. No.26957/2020 (Rakesh Kumar vs. State of M.P.) wherein, the Court has considered the effect of the earlier amendment and its period and held that offence under Section 3/7 of the Act of 1955 is a bailable offence. It is further submitted that the applicant has been lodged in jail since 03.12.2025 and the final conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, thus, it is prayed that the applic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top