SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11116

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ruchika – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sidharth Chhajed[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAJENDRA SINGH

th

ON THE 24 OF DECEMBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 49301 of 2025

RUCHIKA AND OTHERS

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Prashant Sharma - Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Vinod Thakur - GA for the State.

ORDER of Kerala reported as (2018) 16 SCC 602, in which in a habeas corpus petition, the Supreme Court has taken note of the relationship between the persons involved, and opined that since both the persons were major, and even if they are not competent to enter into wedlock, they have a right to live together and even outside the wedlock. Thus, it is submitted that the present petitioners, who are entitled to reside together may be protected from any violence by any person or their parents.

This petition has been filed by the petitioner no.1 is 20 years 7 months

and 19 days old and petitioner no.2 is 20 years 6 months and 7 days old and

seeking the following reliefs:-

"The petitioners humbly request the hon’ble High Court to take into account the Grounds Urged and directs the respondents to give

police protection to the petitioners."

2. The grievance of the petitioners are that they

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top