Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anand Kishore Sachdeva – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Agarwal – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHISH SHROTI
ON THE 24 OF DECEMBER, 2025 SECOND APPEAL No. 2608 of 2025
ANAND KISHORE SACHDEVA
Versus
SANJAY AGARWAL
Appearance:
Mr. N.K. Gupta - Senior Advocate with Mr. Kamal Mangal -
Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Baldev Chhahira - Advocate for the respondents.
ORDER parties. As per the plaintiff's pleading in plaint, the defendant is tenant in one corner shop situated at ground floor at the rate of rent of Rs.303/- per month and is running his business o
The landlord is obligated to plead and prove the availability of alternate accommodation and its unsuitability for the alleged need, as per the provisions of section 12(1)(f) of the Accommodation Con....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the genuine need for commencing a new business under Section 12(1)(f) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act and the court's discretion in allowi....
The landlord's bona fide need and the absence of suitable alternative accommodation for the tenant are crucial factors in determining eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
The bona fide need of a landlord under the M.P. Accommodation Control Act includes the needs of their spouse, and heirs can execute eviction decrees despite the original landlord's death.
The landlord is the best judge of his need and the court cannot advise the landlord to compromise his necessity for the benefit of the tenant.
The landlord's bonafide requirement for the premises and the landlord's right to choose a suitable premise for carrying on the business are key legal principles established in the judgment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article