SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11123

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Hukumchand – Appellant
Versus
Sureshchandra – Respondent


Advocates:
Akhilesh Kumar Saxena,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAJENDRA SINGH

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 4341 of 2025

HUKUMCHAND

Versus

SURESHCHANDRA

Appearance:

Shri Akhilesh Kumar Saxena - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Ritu Raj Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the respondent [R-1].

Heard on: 24.11.2025

Delivered On: 24.12.2025

ORDER revision petitioner in favour of respondent and on non-payment within the statutory period after service of notice.

This criminal revision is preferred under Section 438 read with Section

442 of BNSS, 2023 challenging the illegality of judgment dated 21.08.2025 in CRA No.28/2024 by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Alot District Ratlam arising out of the judgment dated 10.08.2024 in SCNIA No.04/2021 by JMFC, Alot, Ratlam whereby the appellant has been convicted under section 138 of N.I.Act, 1881 and has been sentenced to till rising of the Court with compensation of Rs.5,30,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum from 01.04.2020 till realization under Section 357(3) of Cr.P.C with default

stipulation of 06 months R.I.

2. Facts in brief are that a complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Act,

1881 was preferred before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Alot, Ratl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top