SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 25

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vikash Kumar Dohare – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Vibhor Khandelwal[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA

th

ON THE 9 OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 927 of 2026

VIKASH KUMAR DOHARE

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Jayesh Gurnani - Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Pranjali Yajurvedi (ga) appearing on behalf of Advocate

General[r-1].

ORDER (supra) is concerned, the same reads as under:-

This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article

226 of the Constitution of India praying for the following reliefs:

"7.1 That, the instant petition may kindly be allowed and the respondent no. 7 and 8 may kindly be directed to unfreeze the bank account of the petitioner bearing account no. 5847398211 with respondent no. 7 and 8 and all its subsequent and consequential action taken by the respondents may

kindly be set-aside ;

7.2 That, the cost of instant petition may also be awarded to the petitioner and any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience may also - be granted to the petitioner."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the case of the

petitioner is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top