SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 47

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Dr. Rajesh Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Saurabh Sunder,Additional Solicitor General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

WRIT PETITION No. 12687 of 2024

DR. RAJESH MISHRA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Saurabh Sunder- Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rajesh Tiwari- Advocate for the respondent No. 1 Union of India.

Shri Yogesh Bhatnager- Advocate for respondent No. 2.

ORDER discipline Physical Education in the year 2001. The petitioner refers to the notification Annexure P/6 issued by Ministry of HRD dated 16.09.2009 whereby it has been mentioned in para-5 that the age of superannuation of Librarians, cadre of Physical Education personnel of centrally funded technical institutions and Registrar and Finance Officer of IITs, NITs, etc. would be at par with UGC and hence it is fixed at 62 years subject to he possessing qualification/experience as prescribed by the UGC from time to time. The enhanced age of superannuation would take effect from the date of order i.e. 16.09.2009.

(Reserved on : 13/10/2025)

(Pronounced on: 09/01/2026)

The petitioner who is working as Student Activity & Sports Officer

(SAS Officer) in Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology (For short “MANIT”) is aggrieved by the order Annexure

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top