HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Dr. Rajesh Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN
WRIT PETITION No. 12687 of 2024
DR. RAJESH MISHRA
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Appearance:
Shri Saurabh Sunder- Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri Rajesh Tiwari- Advocate for the respondent No. 1 Union of India.
Shri Yogesh Bhatnager- Advocate for respondent No. 2.
ORDER discipline Physical Education in the year 2001. The petitioner refers to the notification Annexure P/6 issued by Ministry of HRD dated 16.09.2009 whereby it has been mentioned in para-5 that the age of superannuation of Librarians, cadre of Physical Education personnel of centrally funded technical institutions and Registrar and Finance Officer of IITs, NITs, etc. would be at par with UGC and hence it is fixed at 62 years subject to he possessing qualification/experience as prescribed by the UGC from time to time. The enhanced age of superannuation would take effect from the date of order i.e. 16.09.2009.
(Reserved on : 13/10/2025)
(Pronounced on: 09/01/2026)
The petitioner who is working as Student Activity & Sports Officer
(SAS Officer) in Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology (For short “MANIT”) is aggrieved by the order Annexure
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.