SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 56

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Dinesh Singh Bhaghel – Appellant
Versus
State Of M.P – Respondent


Advocates:
,J.P.S.Baghel,Arun Dudawat,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT

th

ON THE 9 OF JANUARY, 2026

WRIT PETITION No. 1411 of 2012

DINESH SINGH BHAGHEL

Versus

STATE OF M.P AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Arun Dudawat - learned counsel for petitioner.

Shri Rajendra Jain -learned Government Advocate for

respondent/State.

ORDER training and passed two years' Diploma Course. After getting enrolled with the Pharmacy Council, petitioner became entitled for promotion to the post of Pharmacist Grade II w.e.f. 17.12.2008. It is further submitted that in the month of January, 2011, respondents prepared gradation list showing the seniority of all Dressers/Compounders Grade-I including petitioner in which the name of petitioner was placed at Sr.No.12. It is further submitted that as per provisions of rules prevailing, incumbent who had completed 5 years of services on the post of Dresser Grade-I, undergone training of Pharmacist and registered as Pharmacist by Pharmacy council, is entitled to and eligible for his further promotion on the post of Pharmacist Grade-II. Since petitioner who had completed the required services of 5 years, undergone training, passed two years' Diploma Course

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top