IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA

&

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ALOK AWASTHI

th

ON THE 8 OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 730 of 2026

M/S ROOPLAL DAULATRAM MANDSAUR

Versus

THE STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Amit Singh Sisodia - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Bhaskar Agrawal - Govt. Advocate for the respondent / State.

ORDER per the requirement of the NIT condition was not the same whose details were mentioned in the tender document. The impugned order is only a show cause notice and the petitioner has been granted time to file the reply. There is no allegation of malafide or lack of competence, therefore, in absence of any allegation of malafide, the petition cannot be entertained against a show cause notice.

Per: Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla

The present petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India challenging the notice dated 23.12.2025 by which the petitioner has been given show cause notice proposing blacklisting of the petitioner,

termination of the ongoing contract and cancellation of registration.

02. Counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that the order of

show cause notice is merely an eyewash and the