SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 93

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Prem Narayan Namdeo – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Aayush Sharma[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH

th

ON THE 8 OF JANUARY, 2026

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 3059 of 2025

PREM NARAYAN NAMDEO AND OTHERS

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Vikash Sharma - Advocate for the applicants.

Ms. Seema Jaiswal - Panel Lawyer for the State of M.P.

None for respondent no.2- Ashish Jain.

ORDER in-chief of PW-1-Ashish Jain, S/o Shri Suresh Jain was conduced but counsel for the accused did not appear and further proceedings were drawn up in the order-sheet in which it is mentioned that accused persons are present in the court. Case is fixed for prosecution evidence and prosecution witness namely Suresh Jain and Suresh Rohra were present.

As per office report the respondent no. 2 is served by RAD mode.

The report is dated 7.1.2026.

Heard on I.A. No.16405/2025, an application for condonation of

delay.

It is allowed and delay in filing of this revision is condoned.

Heard on admission.

The revision is admitted for final hearing.

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter heard

finally.

This revision is directed against the order dated 19.7.2024 passed by

learned VIII A.S.J., Bhopal disal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top