SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 131

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Pratappuri Goswami – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Vibhor Kumar Sahu[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA

th

ON THE 7 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 56950 of 2025

PRATAPPURI GOSWAMI

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Appearance:

Shri Vibhor Kumar Sahu - Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Satendra Singh Sikarwar - PP for the State.

ORDER sought information from Tehsil Shivpuri on the basis of the documents given by accused Sonu, he found out that the land records were fake. Complainant Hridayesh filed a written complaint about the incident at the PS Dehat on September 26, 2020, based on which a case was registered against the accused under Sections 420,467, 468, and 471 of the Indian Penal Code under Crime No. 331/2020. During the investigation, accused Sonu Rathore and Pankaj Sharma, along with applicant/accused Pratap Puri, the then recordkeeper of Shivpuri, and Jitendra alias Jitu were also found to be involved in the incident. The case diary was perused. The arguments of both the parties were considered. An examination of the case reveals that the allegation against the applicant/accused is that he is posted in the Records Branch of the Collectorate, Shivpuri, and that Jitu Kaurav is reported t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top