IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP N. BHATT

th

ON THE 7 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 55239 of 2025

MUKESH KUMAR HALDKAR

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Appearance:

Shri Siddharth Kumar Sharma, counsel for the applicant.

Shri Kamal Singh Baghel, G.A for respondent/State

ORDER submitted that facts of the present case are almost identical. There is no need of custodial interrogation of present applicant. The conclusion of trial will take considerable time. In these circumstances, applicant may be granted anticipatory bail.

This is the first application filed on behalf of the applicant under Section 482

of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in relation to Crime No.74/2025 registered at Police Station - Kundam, District Jabalpur (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Sections 318(2), 316(5), 61(2),336(3),337,338,340(2), 344 of BNS, 2023,

Sections 3, 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and section 65 of I.T. Act.

2. As per the prosecution story, the allegation against the present applicant, who is Samiti Prabandhak (Society Manager), in collusion with the Society issue center, concerned officer, traders and commission agents, sold 7662 quintals of paddy in the open market and obtained wrongful gain of worth Rs.1,76,22,600/-. On the

basis of aforesaid allegation, F.I.R was registered.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent. He has been implicated in the said offence merely because he was Society Manager. He has relied on the order dated 19.12.2025 passed by the Apex Court in same set of matter, of course, in different F.I.R in S.L.P(Cr.) No.15170/2025 and has

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State has fairly submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has passed the order dated 19.12.2025 in SLP(Cr)

No.15170/2025 in the cases relating to Samity Prabhandhak (Society Manager).

5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Aman Rajiv Chhabra Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh SLP (Cr.) No.15170/2025 dated 19.12.2025 has passed the following order :-

"1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. In pursuance of the orders of this court, the petitioners have been appearing in the investigation and are cooperating with the investigating officer (I.O).

3. In view of the aforesaid, the interim orders dated 08.09.2025, 17.10.2025 and 16.10.2025 are made absolute and it is provided that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners, if they continue to co-operate and participate in the investigation.

4. In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on such terms and conditions as may be imposed by the Arresting Officer.

5. The Special Leave Petitions stand disposed of. Pending applications(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of."

6. Considering the aforesaid, I am of the view that the same benefit should be granted to the present applicant on the terms and conditions mentioned in the above order.

7. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed by the applicant is allowed. It is directed that if the applicant is arrested by the police then he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/Arresting Authority.

8. Applicant shall abide by the following conditions under Section 480 (2) of Cr.P.C :-

(a) Applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required;

(b) He shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to complainant or witnesses;

(c) He shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court;

(d) He shall not commit similar offence, of which, he is accused or suspected.

9. However, it is being made clear that in case of bail jump an