SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 145

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Mohd Safar Khan – Appellant
Versus
Ahsok Kumar Mishra – Respondent


Advocates:
Akhilesh Ku Jain[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

th

ON THE 7 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. PETITION No. 5608 of 2025

MOHD SAFAR KHAN

Versus

AHSOK KUMAR MISHRA AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Akhilesh Kumar Jain - Advocate for petitioner.

ORDER application was rejected by the trial Court on 09.01.2024 on the ground that under Order 32 there is a provision for suit by or against persons of unsound mind to be prosecuted or defended through next friend, but there is no provision that the father of person of allegedly unsound mind to be permitted to tender evidence and by reserving liberty to the petitioner/defendant No.1 to produce his father as defendant's witness, the application was rejected. It was also held by the trial Court that looking to the medical papers produced on record, the petitioner does not appear to be a person of unsound mind.

By way of this petition, challenge is made to order Annexure P/8 dated

17.09.2025 whereby the application under Order 32 Rule 1 read with Rule 15 of CPC filed by the petitioner/defendant No.1 has been rejected holding that there are no facts available before the Court to hold that the

petitioner/defendant No.1 is a person of unsou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top