IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI

th

ON THE 7 OF JANUARY, 2026

WRIT PETITION No. 5710 of 2014

SUKHLAL VERMA

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Kailash Chandra Ghildiyal - Senior Advocate with Shri Aditya

Singh Thakur - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Kamalnath Nayak - Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State.

ORDER regularization. The said petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents therein to consider the case of the petitioner for the purpose of regularization. However, vide impugned order dated 01.06.2012 contained in Annexure P/7, the claim of the petitioner was rejected while observing that at the time of appointment of the petitioner, there was no sanctioned post, there was a violation of the reservation rules, and the initial induction was by an authority having no jurisdiction. It is further contended by the senior counsel that similarly situated employees, details of whom are mentioned in paragraph 5.7 of the petition, have been extended the benefit of regularization, and there is no denial of paragraphs 5.7 and 5.8 of the petition by the respondents in the return. The respondents h