SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 170

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt.Surindra Dhavan – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Arun Sharma,Umesh Shrivastava,Gyan Singh,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH

th

ON THE 7 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. APPEAL No. 684 of 2010

SMT.SURINDRA DHAVAN AND OTHERS

Versus

VINOD KUMAR AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Arun Sharma - Advocate for the appellants.

Shri Arvind Kumar Agrawal- Advocate for respondent No.3.

ORDER Rs.2,79,500/- was awarded along with interest from the date of filing of the claim petition till its realization.

1. This miscellaneous appeal has been filed by the appellant/claimant

under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, being aggrieved by the Award dated 15.01.2010 passed by First Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal to the Court of Third Additional Judge, Gwalior (M.P.) (in short "the Claims Tribunal") in Claim Case No.67/2009 on account of inadequacy of compensation amount and seeking enhancement of

compensation.

2. The date of accident, issue of negligence and the liability of the

respondents are not in dispute. The findings recorded by the Claims Tribunal in

this regard are not in question.

3. As per the findings recorded by the Claims Tribunal, in the case of

death of Kapil Dhawan in the motor accident, compensation to the tune of

4. Learned counsel for th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top