SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 212

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anurag Garg – Appellant
Versus
Kailash Chander – Respondent


Advocates:
Vikram Dubey[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ALOK AWASTHI

CIVIL REVISION No. 965 of 2025

ANURAG GARG

Versus

KAILASH CHANDER AND OTHERS

Appearance

Ms. Smriti Razban, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Nilesh Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1.

Shri Ashutosh Nimgaonkar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3.

Reserved on : 20.11.2025 Pronounced on : 06.01.2026

ORDER notice to the respondents for production of original ‘WILL’ and despite service upon them, the respondents chose not to produce the original documents. The petitioner filed two applications viz. one under Order XVIII Rule 16 & 17 CPC and another under Section 64 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 seeking permission to prove the ‘WILL’ by way of secondary evidence and to allow the petitioner to come as witness to prove the said document. The said applications have been dismissed by the learned Trial Court on 13.05.2025 and the said orders have been challenged by the petitioner by filing M.P. No. 4010/2025, the same is pending before this Court in which notices have been issued on 11.08.2025 to the respondents.

01. This petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure,

1908 (here

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top