SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 214

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Motilal Jangid – Appellant
Versus
Chauthmal Jangid – Respondent


Advocates:
Vinay Puranik,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ALOK AWASTHI

MISC. PETITION No. 4308 of 2025

MOTILAL JANGID

Versus

CHAUTHMAL JANGID AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Vinay Puranik, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Ashutosh Nimgaonkar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1

Reserved on : 09.12.2025 Pronounced on : 06.01.2026

ORDER CPC was also filed by the petitioner seeking amendment in the plaint as well as in the relief.

The petitioner before this Court has filed the present petition under

Article 227 of the Constitution of India being disgruntled by the order dated

th

01.07.2025 passed by learned X Additional District Judge, District - Indore, whereby the application filed by the petitioner / plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred as to

"CPC") for amendment in the plaint and relief, has been rejected.

02. Necessary facts for disposal of this petitioner, in brief, are that,

the petitioner filed a Civil Suit No. RCSA/702/22 before the Trial Court under Order VII Rule 1 & 2 of CPC for declaration, title and obtaining independent possession by making partition, mandatory and permanent injunction. In the aforesaid suit,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top