SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 235

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt Santosh Rai – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sanjay Kumar Singh,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI

th

ON THE 6 OF JANUARY, 2026

WRIT PETITION No. 7525 of 2017

SMT. SANTOSH RAI

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER

Appearance:

Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Darshan Soni - Government Advocate for the State.

ORDER basis of said undertaking only, the benefit of revision of pay was extended to the petitioner and as it was noticed later on that the petitioner was entitled for the pay scale which was extended to her, the said mistake was rectified by issuing the impugned order dated 26.12.2016 and column No.2 reflects that the petitioner was given a particular pay scale whereas column No.3 reflects that the petitioner was entitled for the revised pay scale from the respective dates mentioned in column No.1.

This is a petition by the petitioner seeking quashment of the order

dated 26.12.2016 (Annexure P/1) by which the benefit extended to the

petitioner of revised pay scale has been withdrawn.

2. Counsel for the petitioner contended that the controversy involved

in the present petition has already been dealt with by the Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab and others

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top