SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 236

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Veerendra Singh Lodhi @ Veerendra Kumar Lodhi – Appellant
Versus
Mukesh Soni – Respondent


Advocates:
Rinkesh Goyal,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH

th

ON THE 6 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. APPEAL No. 589 of 2017

VEERENDRA SINGH LODHI @ VEERENDRA KUMAR LODHI

Versus

MUKESH SONI AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Rinkesh Goyal - Advocate for the appellant/claimant.

Shri Kamal Kumar Rochalani-Advocate for respondent No.3/Insurance

Company.

ORDER interest from the date of filing of the claim petition till its realization.

This miscellaneous appeal has been filed by the appellant/claimant under

Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, being aggrieved by the Award dated 13/01/2017 passed by the Additional Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karera, District Shivpuri (M.P.) (hereinafter referred to as “the Claims Tribunal”) in Claim Case No. 66/2015, on the ground of inadequacy of

compensation and seeking enhancement thereof.

2. The date of accident, the issue of negligence, and the liability of the respondents are not in dispute. The findings recorded by the Claims Tribunal on

these aspects are not under challenge.

3. As per the findings of the Claims Tribunal, the appellant/claimant sustained 70% permanent disability due to the injuries suffered in the motor accident. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top