SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 253

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ajay Bheel – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Satyendra Singh Rajput[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE

th

ON THE 5 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 60420 of 2025

AJAY BHEEL AND OTHERS

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Appearance:

Shri Satyendra Singh Rajput - Advocate for applicants.

Ms Anjali Gyanani - Public Prosecutor for respondent/State.

ORDER contending that on the basis of the allegations and the material available on record, no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out.

This is first bail application under Section 482 of BNSS preferred by the

applicants for grant of anticipatory bail.

Applicants apprehend their arrest in connection with Crime No. 222/2025

registered at Police Station Fatehgarh District Guna (M.P.) for the offences

punishable under Sections 34(2) & 49(a) of Excise Act.

According to the prosecution case, on 08.08.2025, the police seized 80 ltr.

of illicit liquor from the joint possession of applicants. On the basis of aforesaid,

crime has been registered against the applicants.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants have falsely been

implicated in the matter. Offence is triable by JMFC. Disposal of the matter will take long time. It is submitted that app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top