SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 256

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ajeet @Tinku – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Deepak Mehra,Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBODH ABHYANKAR

th

ON THE 5 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 60105 of 2025

AJEET @TINKU AND OTHERS

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Appearance:

Shri Arpit Kumar Oswal - Advocate for the applicants.

Shri Hemant Sharma -Govt. Adv. appearing on behalf of Advocate

General[r-1].

ORDER applicants' father who was also an accused in the case, passed away and thus, the applicants could not mark their presence in the trial court, as they were performing the last rites of their father and although an attempt was made to file an application in the trial court on 16.12.2025 however, the same was not taken on record and the arrest warrants have been issued against them. It is also submitted that the trial is at the fag end and the applicants are ready to appear in the trial court and there was no reason for them not to appearing in the trial except the death of their father. Thus, it is submitted that the application be allowed.

1] They are heard and perused the case diary/challan papers.

2] This is the applicants' first application under Section 482 of the

Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/Section 438 of Criminal Procedure

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top