SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 290

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Jitendra Chouhan – Appellant
Versus
Sangita Chouhan – Respondent


Advocates:
Aviral Vikas Khare,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B. P. SHARMA

th

ON THE 5 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 1809 of 2021

JITENDRA CHOUHAN AND OTHERS

Versus

SANGITA CHOUHAN

Appearance:

Shri Aviral Vikas Khare - Advocate for the petitioners through video

conferencing.

None for the respondent.

ORDER respondent/complainant under Section 200 Cr.P.C. against the petitioners, alleging herself to be the wife of Petitioner No.1 and alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406, 323, and 34 IPC. Petitioner No.1 is alleged to be her husband, while Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are his parents, and Petitioner Nos.4 and 5 are his sisters. It is submitted that the learned Trial Court, without following the procedure prescribed under Section 202 Cr.P.C., mechanically took cognizance of the complaint and issued notices to the petitioners vide order dated 09.10.2018. It is further submitted that the respondent suppressed the material fact of her previous subsisting marriage with Bhuvnesh Chouhan, rendering the alleged marriage with Petitioner No.1 null and void ab initio under the Hindu Marriage Act. This position has been upheld by this Court in Criminal Revisi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top