SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 292

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Mohammed Idiris – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA

&

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADEEP MITTAL

th

ON THE 5 OF JANUARY, 2026

WRIT PETITION No. 4951 of 2020

MOHAMMED IDIRIS

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Vinayak Prasad Shah - Advocate for petitioner.

Shri Shreyash Pandit - Advocate for respondent No.2, 4, 5 & 6. Shri Piyush Jain - Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER (iii). Direct the respondent to compensate the petitioner with adequate amount for inordinate delay in setting retiral dues of the petitioner.

Per: Justice Pradeep Mittal

By way of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs:-

(i). Pay the petitioner his permanent pension with all unpaid retiral

dues including provident fund, leave encashment, arrears of pension etc with consequential pensionary benefit with compoundable rate of interest @ 12%

from the date the same became due.

(ii). Direct the respondents to produce service record of the petitioner

including, appointment letter, GPF passbook details of deduction made from salary of the petitioner, Pension Payment Order etc. For the perusal and

consider

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top