SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 295

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Guddi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Indrajeet Singh (D) Lrs Narendra Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
R.P.Gupta,Akhilesh Gupta,R.K.Sharma,Kuldeep Singh,L.K.Sharma

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH

th

ON THE 5 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. APPEAL No. 344 of 2009

INDRAJEET SINGH("D")TH:LRS NARENDRA AND OTHERS

Versus

GUDDI DEVI AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Ajay Singh Rathore - Advocate for legal heirs of owner of the

vehicle- appellant No.1 Indrajeet Singh (since dead) and driver of the

vehicle- appellant No.2- Gendalal.

Shri Naresh Singh Tomar- Advocate on behalf of Shri Kuldeep Singh-

Advocate for respondent No.5/Insurance Company.

Shri Ramesh Prasad Gupta-Advocate for respondent Nos. 2, 3 and

4/claimants.

Respondent No.1- claimant has died during penency of appeal and her

name has been deleted.

WITH

MISC. APPEAL No. 390 of 2009

GUDDI DEVI AND OTHERS

Versus

INDRAJEET SINGH (D) LRS NARENDRA SINGH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri R.P. Gupta- Advocate for appellants/claimants

Shri Naresh Singh Tomar- Advocate on behalf of Shri Kuldeep Singh-Advocate on

behalf of respondent No.3/Insurance Company.

Shri Ajay Singh Rathore-Advocate on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (owner

and driver of vehicle).

ORDER MA No. 344/2009 has been preferred by the appellants, namely the owner and driver of the offending vehicle, challenging the award to the exte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top