SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11160

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Krishnlal – Appellant
Versus
Ramanlal – Respondent


Advocates:
Rishiraj Trivedi[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ALOK AWASTHI

th

ON THE 19 OF DECEMBER, 2025

MISC. PETITION No. 7255 of 2025

KRISHNLAL

Versus

RAMANLAL AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Rishiraj Trivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Vinod Thakur, learned Government Advocate for respondent

No.7 / State.

ORDER

The petitioner before this Court has filed the present petition under

Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the order dated

nd

22.11.2025 passed by the II Civil Judge, Senior Division, District - Khargone, whereby the application filed by the petitioner / defendant under Order VI Rule 17 for the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for amendment in

the written submission has been rejected.

02. Facts of the case reveal that the respondent No.1 / plaintiff has

field a civil suit against the petitioner / defendant for declaration of sale deed

dated 09.02.2022 as void so also for permanent injunction.

03. Thereafter, defendant No.1 submitted a written statement

denying the averments made in the plaint and prayed for dismissal of the

suit.

04. During the pendency of the civil suit, defendant No.1 filed an amendment in the written statement. Thereafter, the plainti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top