SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11172

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Au Small Finance Bank – Appellant
Versus
Akhand Pratap Singh Yadav – Respondent


Advocates:
Mallikarjun Khare[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA

&

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADEEP MITTAL

th

ON THE 19 OF DECEMBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 47805 of 2025

AU SMALL FINANCE BANK

Versus

AKHAND PRATAP SINGH YADAV AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Mallikarjun Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner through

Video Conferencing.

ORDER notice under Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act, and when the debt was not paid, an application was filed before the CJM Tikamgarh under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. Before passing the aforesaid impugned order, the learned Magistrate heard on the registration of the application. Vide order dated 03.09.2025 (Annexure P/3) learned the Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Tikamgarh (MP) has dismissed an application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act on the technical ground that notice under Section 13 (2) of the SARFAESI Act was not issued and served in accordance with law.

Per: Justice Vivek Rusia

Heard on the question of admission.

The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of

the Constitution of India, being aggrieved by the order dated 03.09.2025 (Annexure P/3) passed in MJCR No.172/2025 whereby the Chief Judicial Magi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top