SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11189

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Narendra Jain – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Nirmal Sharma,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA

th

ON THE 19 OF DECEMBER, 2025

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 46146 of 2024

NARENDRA JAIN AND OTHERS

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Mr. Nirmal Sharma - Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Saket Udeniya - Govt. Advocate for respondent/State. Mr. Amit Lahoti, learned counsel for the respondent [R-2].

______________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Present petition under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of FIR

registered at Crime No.652 of 2024 Police Station Kotwali District Shivpuri for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of IPC. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the disputed property is situated at Survey No. 80 min 4, and its area is 6,000 sq. ft. The admitted position is that the petitioner is the purchaser, petitioners No. 2 and 3 are witnesses, and respondent No. 2 is the owner of the property. The transaction that resulted in the registration of the FIR began on 20.01.2023, when the

petitioner, upon the respondent's proposal, intended to purchase the property. The transaction continued over time, and the payment made, totaling Rs.85,0

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top