IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT SETH

WRIT PETITION No. 1978 of 2016

HEERA SINGH AND OTHERS

Versus

POORAN SINGH KUSHWAH

Appearance:

Shri Kamal Kumar Jain - Advocate for petitioners.

None for respondent though served.

Shri Kaushalendra Singh Tomar - Government Advocate for

State.

Reserved on : 16/12/2025 Delivered on : 19/12/2025

ORDER settlement was arrived at between the petitioners and the respondent. Accordingly, an application under Order 23 Rule 3 C.P.C. was filed by the parties before the learned trial Court, seeking disposal of the suit on the basis of the compromise entered into between them. He submits that learned trial Court, vide impugned order dated 27.07.2015, allowed the said application preferred by the parties and has passed the compromise decree (Annexure P/1) but the prayer made by the petitioners seeking a refund of court fees was rejected by the learned trial Court on the ground that since the suit was not being disposed in a Lok Adalat or under Section 89 C.P.C., the petitioners are not entitled for refund of court fees.

1. The instant writ petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution

of India, challenges the order date