IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR

th

ON THE 16 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 57002 of 2025

DHARMENDRA @ DHIRENDRA

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Appearance:

Shri Shivendra Singh Parihar, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Aditya Garg, GA for the respondent/State.

ORDER house as property broker. Sundar Bai proposed to sale him the disputed house and executed an agreement. He has paid entire consideration amount in favour of Sundar Bai. Later, it was revealed that the registry shown by Sundar Bai for title of the disputed house and plot is forged. On such allegations, P.S. Nanakheda District Ujjain registered FIR at crime No. 271/2024 for offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34,120-B of IPC against Sundar Bai, Ankit Solanki and Imran. Statement of witnesses were recorded. Imran was apprehended. Imran in his statement recorded under Section 23 of Bhartiya Shakhya Adhiniyam, 2023 informed that Ajaj Nagori provided him forged sale deed executed by Vandana in favour of Sundar Bai and on the basis of that sale deed, Sundar Bai executed sale deed in favour of Aayush Jain. Accordingly Ajaj Nagori was apprehended. Ajaj Nagori in his statement recorded under section 23 of Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 informed that he had approached Laxmi Narayan Parmar for preparation of forged registered sale deed in favour of Sundar Bai. He had provided all relevant documents to Laxminarayan. Thereafter Laxminarayan had provided him forged registered sale deed in favour of Sundar Bai. Gulrej @ Baba has provided him funds for payment to Laxminarayan towards preparation of forged sale deed. Accordingly, Laxminarayan Parmar was also apprehended. In his statement recorded under Section 23 of Bhartiya Shakshya Adhiniyam, Laxminarayan informed that Ajaj Nagori approached him for forging the registered sale deed in favour of Sundar Bai. He approached Dharmendra Sahu(applicant) for preparation of forged sale deed. Dharmendra Sahu prepared forged sale deed alongwith forged signature and forged seal of Registrar Ujjain and handed over to him. He handed over this document to Ajaj Nagori. He was paid Rs. 11 lacs. Applicant Dharmendra Sahu was arrested on 06.10.2025. He is in custody ever since. Applicant Dharmendra informed that Santi @ Dheevendra had provided Blank stamps to Laxminarayan. No incriminating material is seized at the instance of the applicant Dharmendra. On completion of investigation, supplementary final report was submitted against the applicant. Co-accused Laxminarayan has been granted benefit of bail vide order dated 20.11.2024 passed in M.Cr.C. No.46680/2024.

This first application has been filed by applicant under Section 483 of

BNSS, 2023 for grant of bail in connection with Crime No.271/2024 registered at Police Station Nanakheda District Ujjain (M.P.) for offence punishable under Section (s) 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 and 120-B of IPC. The applicant is in judicial

custody since 06.10.2025.

As per the case of prosecution, Vandana Saraf submitted a written complaint

to SHO P.S. Nanakheda District Ujjain that she had purchased plot No. B-2, Tripti Vihar Goyalakhurd Indore Road Ujjain from Naveen Cooperative Housing Society Ujjain vide sale deed dated 23.5.1996. While depositing the annual tax, she came to know that house on plot No. B-2 is transferred to name of some Aayush Jain in the Municipal records. She further came to know that Sundar Bai Solanki had executed sale deed dated 30.1.2024 of the disputed plot in favour of Aayush Jain. She had never executed any sale deed in favour of Sundar Bai. The complaint was inquired into. Aayush Jain informed that Mohd. Imran proposed to get him a

Learned Counsel for the applicant, in addition to the grounds mentioned in the application, submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter merely on the basis of statement of co-accused in police custody. No incriminating article is recovered at the instance of th