HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Nikita – Appellant
Versus
Kotak Mahindra Bank – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA
ON THE 15 OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 792 of 2026
NIKITA
Versus
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK AND OTHERS
Appearance:
Shri Sudeel Yadav - Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Pranjali Yajurvedi - Government Advocate for the
respondent/State.
ORDER
This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article
226 of the Constitution of India praying for the following reliefs:
"a) Allow the present petition with costs;
b) Direct Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 to forthwith remove
the illegal hold/freeze on the petitioner’s bank account;
c) Pass any other order, writ or direction which this Hon’ble Court may
deem fit and proper in the interest of justice."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the case of the
petitioner is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in the case of Malcolm Murayis & Ors. Vs. State Bank of India and Others Malcolm Murayis & Ors. Vs. State Bank of India and Others passed in W.P.
No.1100 of 2024 dated 26.04.2024.
3. So far as the decision rendered in the case of Malcolm Murayis
(supra) is concerned, the same reads as under:-
"1] This order shall also govern
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.