SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 383

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Narayan – Appellant
Versus
Chagganlal – Respondent


Advocates:
Zenith Chhablani[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI

th

ON THE 15 OF JANUARY, 2026 MISC. PETITION No. 7303 of 2025

NARAYAN AND OTHERS

Versus

CHAGGANLAL AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Zenith Chhablani - Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Gajendra Singh Dodia - G.A. for the respondent/State.

ORDER prayer in the application under Order 21 Rule 11 of CPC be dismissed. After that Annexure P-6 an application under Order 21 Rule 32 of CPC was filed by the decree holder. Counsel further submits that the order passed by the Court below is bad in law as no satisfaction with regard to the wilful disobedience of decree has been recorded by the executing Court. Hence, prays for allowing the petition by setting aside the impugned order.

This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed

against the impugned order dated 29.11.2025 passed by the III Civil Judge, Junior

Division, Tarana, District Ujjain in EXA No.07/2025.

2. In the impugned order it has been directed that a notice be issued

against the judgment debtor/petitioners herein as to why he be not kept in civil

prison for infringement of the decree and perpetual injunction.

3. Learned counsel fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top