SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 387

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Md. Tanjimul Ashad Khan – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Deepak Kumaar Raghuwanshi[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP N. BHATT

th

ON THE 15 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 49890 of 2025

MD. TANJIMUL ASHAD KHAN

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Appearance:

Shri Navneet Shukla - Advocate for the applicant.

Shri A Rajeshwar Rao - Advocate for the respondent.

ORDER but a larger loan could be secured if he formed a proprietorship firm and obtained GST registration in the name of the said firm. Acting on this inducement and false assurance, the complainant registered a firm in the name of Maa Narmada Traders for which documents such as Aadhaar, PAN, bank statements, land records and loan books were handed over to the co- accused. It is further alleged that without the complainant's consent, the co- accused got registered an email ID jdrealities99@gmail.com in the GST records and also registered the complainant’s son’s mobile number for GSTOTP verifications. That subsequently, GST Registration No.23ALLPL1056B1ZM was issued in the name of Maa Narmada Traders. However, the complainant never carried out any business through the said registration. Later, when GST authorities visited the complainant, he was informed that tax due

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top