SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 470

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Purshottam Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Shatru Daman Singh Bhadouriyia[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH

th

ON THE 14 OF JANUARY, 2026 MISC. PETITION No. 7052 of 2025

PURSHOTTAM AGRAWAL AND OTHERS

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri N.K. Gupta - Senior Advocate along with Shri Shatru Daman

Singh Bhadouriyia- Advocate for petitioners.

Shri Rinkesh Goyal- Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER them vide registered sale deed dated 03.09.1983, admeasuring 0.721 hectare. The old survey number of the land was 1108. It is further pleaded that after purchase of the land, demarcation was conducted twice, on 24.04.2006 and 29.07.2011, and thereafter a diversion order was passed by the competent authority in accordance with law. The plaintiffs challenged the action of respondent No. 2, who initiated proceedings against them, and sought a declaration that they are owners in possession of the suit property along with a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with their possession or dismantling any part of the property. Along with the suit, the plaintiffs also filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC seeking temporary injunction restraining the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top