SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 476

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rajnish Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Ganga Prasad – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashok Kumar Jain[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

th

ON THE 14 OF JANUARY, 2026 CIVIL REVISION No. 890 of 2025

RAJNISH PANDEY

Versus

GANGA PRASAD AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Ashok Kumar Jain - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Ashish Kumar Pathak-Advocate for the respondent No. 1.

Shri Krishna Kumar Pandey-Advocate for the respondent No. 2.

Shri Yadvendra Dwivedi-Advocate for the respondent No. 11.

ORDER counsel for the petitioner/objector that during course of execution of the decree when the clerk of Court (Machkuri) along with revenue authorities went to the spot then he prepared a report dated 17.05.2025 mentioning therein that as per current map the construction stands in survey No. 405. On the strength of the said report Annexure C-6, it is argued before this Court that the identity and location of the construction of the original defendant No. 1 is in serious dispute, that whether it is in survey No. 405, or in Survey No. 390.

By way of the present petition, challenge is made to the order passed

by the Executing Court, placed on record as Annexure C-8 dated 05.08.2025 whereby the Executing Court has rejected the application of the petitioner/objector un

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top