IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

th

ON THE 13 OF JANUARY, 2026 MISC. PETITION No. 7383 of 2025

SATIN FINSERV LTD. TARAASHANA FINANCIAL SERVICES AND

OTHERS

Versus

SUMIT KUMAR YADAV

Appearance:

Shri Uttam Maheshwari - Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Aditya Veer Singh - Advocate for the respondents.

ORDER basis of various judgments passed by this Court in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, whereas the jurisdiction conferred on the Labour Court is of different nature and the Labour Court is required to decide the industrial dispute as such. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner-employer that in the event the domestic enquiry is defective or no domestic enquiry is conducted against the workmen prior to termination of his services, then the Labour Court cannot set aside the order simpliciter on that ground and it is obligatory for the Labour Court to decide the industrial dispute once and for all and therefore, it is settled in law that the Labour Court has to grant opportunity to the employer to adduce evidence as to the alleged misconduct of the workman before the Labour Court in c