SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 547

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rajendra Pawar – Appellant
Versus
Pravin Saxcena – Respondent


Advocates:
Mayank Kumar Shrivastava,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B. P. SHARMA

th

ON THE 13 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 58768 of 2025

RAJENDRA PAWAR

Versus

PRAVIN SAXCENA

Appearance:

Shri Mayank Kumar Shrivastava - Advocate for the petitioner.

None for respondent.

ORDER another under Section 311 of CrPC for re-examination of the complainant and that application has been allowed by the trial court and affirmed by the Revisional Court.

This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 against

the impugned order dated 28.11.2025 passed in CRR No. 758/2025 by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal whereby the Revisional court affirmed the order of the trial Court dated 30-10-2025 by which application of the

respondent under Section 91 and 311 of CR.PC is allowed.

2. As per the facts of the case, the respondent filed a complaint

against the petitioner under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act,1881 which was pending before the trial Court at Bhopal. The case was listed for complainant's evidence on several dates but, the petitioner took time again and again and on 11-07-2023, the complainant was present for evidence but, as the accused and his counsel was not presen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top