SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 572

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Satish Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Additional Solicitor General[P-1],Nirmal Sharma[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK

&

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL VERMA

th

ON THE 13 OF JANUARY, 2026

WRIT APPEAL No. 2993 of 2025

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Versus

SATISH KUMAR

Appearance:

Shri Paveen Kumar Newaskar - Dy. S.G for the appellants/Union of India.

Shri Niraml Sharma - Advocate for the respondent.

ORDER period, he preferred an application on 26.11.2016 along with medical certificate and the Pathology report, which has been received in the office of respondents on 28.11.2016. The appellant afforded several opportunities to the respondent/petitioner to join his duties and they waited for long Eight months of his arrival to join the duties, but the respondent/petitioner did not turn, therefore, the appellants conducted inquiry and ultimately, by the impugned order, the respondent/petitioner has been removed from service invoking Rule 17 and 20 of the ITBP Act Rules 1947. Thereafter, he preferred appeal against the said order, which was also dismissed.

Per: Justice Anil Verma

The appellants have preferred this intra Court appeal under Section 2

(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, being aggr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top